I stunned some young Books Outside the Binding visitors last week when I told them how, at one time, every book and newspaper page had to be arranged by hand, inked and sent through a printing press. We were looking at handmade bookmarks that one of the curators made on a letterpress. One of the kids ran his finger over a quote from Mark Twain and said, "This is cool ... but why don't they just use a computer and printer?" I thought maybe their age had something to do with their response—that they haven't been exposed to pre-PC printing methods. Wrong! The same question came up in a Gallery talk last Thursday with Tim O'Brien, a letterpress instructor at the Lawrence Arts Center. Several adults in the audience questioned why letterpress is still used and taught when technology has made it so easy to type a paragraph, change the font, resize the text and print your pages via Microsoft Word.
It's common anymore to think in terms of speed, efficiency, cost and practicality. We're used to readily available everything at a discounted rate. So, I tried explaining to the three boys how an artist's desire to slow down, mix pigment and print pages on quality handmade paper was philosophically different than say, printing a stack of Us magazines. They looked bored. So, I tried comparing it to riding horses and how different the world looks and smells at 3 miles per hour—how I see things on horseback that go unnoticed in a car. I told them I feel more involved—like I'm participating more in the the world around me rather than speeding through it, but that when it comes to grocery shopping and going to work, I'm grateful to have a car. I was hoping they'd understand the value of both.
I wished I'd met these kids after Tim O'Brien's History of Letterpress talk because a better answer required reflection. After hearing Tim explain his own reasons for loving letterpress (tactile, sculptural and more intimate than inkjet printing is capable of achieving), I decided it's not about whether one printing process makes more sense than another, but rather which best completes the task at hand. Today we have the luxury of choice—something early bookmakers didn't—and in a time when reproductions and mass-produced products are a available cheaply and readily, producing copies of New York Times bestsellers on commercial inkjet printers makes sense. On the flipside, however, the use of letterpress reflects the long history of bookmaking and demonstrates how intrinsically linked artists can be to their product.
Page 1 of 1 pages
Everything that I hear about the current gallery exhibit makes me love it more! Thanks for this great little explanation—even though I already liked the idea of letterpress printing, this helps me understand WHY it appealed to me.
Cool, Lissa. Yeah, it’s challenging to convey the value of something so superficially unnecessary, you know? I’ve noticed a growing appreciation of hand-made stuff since the advent of social networking, which spawned Etsy and other similar sites. I mean, why knit a sweater? Why knit socks? Why pay someone 3x the price of a scarf from Fashion Bug to make you one? The answers to these questions are similar to why I appreciate Letterpress. Even in the graphic design field, hand lettering is reasserting itself amidst generic, predictable font choices. A great example of this can be seen in Hand Job: A Catalog of Type (686.22 PER). Again, why labor over something that can easily be reproduced electronically?
Hm ... can’t seem to link to our catalog ... here it is on Amazon:
Great article Heather. I think that’s what makes “Books Outside the Binding” such an interesting exhibit. We’re all familiar with books, but understanding the choices an artist makes when assembling these books—letterpress vs computer-generated type, handmade vs machine-made paper, etc.—allows us to appreciate these works of art on a whole new level.
Thanks, Brea! I was just thinking about writers and how letterpress allows them a chance to interect with their text (if they do the printing, or even just feeling it) so intimately. Words take shape two-dimensionally, how often does one think of text in 3D? I imagine a writer letterpressing his/her own work might be quite moving.
Come On! It’s not that hard of a sell. We still read Shakespeare, and Latin dictionaries are still available. Some college students still read . I can even still buy black and white film… and there are several companies still making top of the line mechanical film cameras. Imagine that! At what arbitrary point in the chronology of the history of the development of civilization do we start abandoning foundational disciplines?
Learning and practicing craft is enriching to mind and body, and there are still plenty of people in the world willing to pay for the products of fine craft, so it can also be good for making a living (current downturn not withstanding).
Letterpress has a different reason for being now, a different burden to bear, and a different audience to delight. But you don’t have to justify its existence any more than you need to justify a yoga class, small scale farming, or getting your vitamins and fiber from fruit instead of pills.
The space after read is supposed to have the word Chaucer in it. I don’t know why it’s not there, but I’m not trying to be funny. Of course College students read… though it was funny to read it that way at first.
Well said, Elias! And I like your original typo minus Chaucer.
It shouldn’t be a hard sell, but sometimes it’s a real struggle to remind people of the value in things that don’t produce immediate results or say, experiencing Shakespeare’s poetry aloud vs. hyper-focusing solely on his isolated themes via repackaged and minimized overviews.
I’m going to add yoga, small scale framing and vitamins to my analogy list!
Thanks for reading/responding, Elias. Much appreciated!
Page 1 of 1 pages
Add A Comment
* = Required fields
Your Email will not be displayed
Allowed HTML
Allow 1 minute between posts.
SUBMIT COMMENT:
Rate This Post
Posted On:
Posted in:
Tagged With:
Comments: